|
|
|
|
LRP
Reports:
Data Focus Archive |
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
Japan
Consumer Price Index
Monthly
January 2008 through September 2010
% Change, Year-on-Year |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Statistics Bureau, Ministry
of Internal Affairs and
Communications, Japan.
Japan continued in September to back
away from the deflation abyss. The
country's Consumer Price Index for
September 2010 was
up 0.3% MoM and
down only 0.6% YoY. This YoY figure
represented improvement from the
0.9%, 0.7%,
0.9% and 0.9% YoY declines
reported for May, June, July and August, respectively,
and YoY declines ranging from 1.1%
to 2.5% during the May 2009 through
April 2010 timeframe. The 0.6% YoY decline
of September 2010 was also notable
because
it was achieved despite a 12.9% YoY
drop in education costs reflecting the elimination of public high
school tuition nationwide in
March 2010. Importantly, two key CPI
components, food and fuel, light,
water, were up 0.6% and 3.3% YoY,
respectively, in September.
Japan
Consumer Price Index
"Ten Major Group Index"
September 2010
Index Value;
% Change, Month-on-Month and
Year-on-Year |
|
|
Group: |
Index
Value
(2005=100) |
% Change,
MoM |
% Change,
YoY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
99.8 |
0.3 |
-0.6 |
|
General (ex.
rent) |
100.0 |
0.4 |
-0.6 |
|
General (ex.
fresh food) |
99.1 |
0.0 |
-1.1 |
|
General (ex.
food, energy) |
97.1 |
0.1 |
-1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods |
100.6 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Services |
99.1 |
-0.4 |
-1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food |
104.6 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
|
Housing |
99.3 |
0.0 |
-0.5 |
|
Fuel, light,
water |
106.8 |
0.0 |
3.3 |
|
Furniture,
household
utensils |
88.8 |
0.2 |
-4.2 |
|
Clothes,
footwear |
102.2 |
5.9 |
-0.9 |
|
Medical care |
98.7 |
0.1 |
-0.5 |
|
Transportation,
communication |
98.2 |
-0.7 |
0.0 |
|
Education |
89.8 |
0.0 |
-12.9 |
|
Reading,
recreation |
93.1 |
-1.2 |
-1.3 |
|
Miscellaneous |
101.3 |
0.1 |
-0.3 |
|
|
Source: Statistics Bureau,
Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications, Japan. |
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
|
United States of America
Household Debt Balance
Quarter-End
Q1:2003 through Q3:2010
Trillions of US Dollars |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of
New York.
The Federal
Reserve Bank of New York reports
that the US household debt balance
has declined to $11.58 trillion as
of
quarter-end Q3:10.
This is down $110.0 billion from
quarter-end Q2:10,
down $490 billion YoY, and down $922.0
billion from this cycle's peak of
$12.50 trillion at quarter-end Q3:08.
United States of
America
Household Debt Balance
Quarter-End, Net Change versus
Previous Year
Q1:2003 through Q3:2010
Trillions of US Dollars |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of
New York.
The YoY net
change in the US
household debt balance, as
shown immediately above, peaked at
$1.3 trillion at quarter-end Q3:06,
started declining sharply as of
quarter-end Q2:08, and flipped into
negative territory at quarter-end
Q1:09. The YoY net change has
stabilized in a range of roughly
-$450.0 billion to -$550.0 billion
in the five most recent quarters.
The five key
components of the US household debt
balance, as defined for this data
series, are mortgage indebtedness,
home equity lines of credit, auto
loans, credit card debt and student
loans.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
|
United States of America
"Discouraged Workers"
Monthly
January 2008 through September 2010
Thousands |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The total number
of US discouraged workers* has
remained stubbornly high during
2010. As shown in the chart above, discouraged
workers totaled 1.209 million in
September 2010. This exceeded the previous
peaks in this cycle
of 1.204 million and 1.207 million
reported for February and June,
respectively.
United States of America
"Discouraged Workers"
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through September 2010
Thousands |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The YoY net
change in the number of US
discouraged workers in September, as
shown immediately above, was
+503,000, the largest YoY increase
during this cycle. This
significantly exceeded the
previous cycle-high net change of
+473,000 registered in February
2010.
In the view of
LRP, this data set provides important
evidence that the 2.0% YoY increase
in Q3:10 US GDP, reported on October
29, was in no way strong enough to
have a meaningful positive impact on
the US employment situation.
* US BLS defines
discouraged workers as "those who
did not actively look for work in
the prior 4 weeks for reasons such
as 1) thinks no work available, 2)
could not find work, 3) lacks
schooling or training, 4) employer
thinks too young or old, and 5)
other types of discrimination."
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
|
1 |
|
|
...the
number of workdays per week that
private cars are currently banned
from Beijing, China’s urban core. |
|
|
4.5 million |
|
|
...the
estimated number of passenger cars
and light trucks currently using
Beijing roads. |
|
|
6.7 million |
|
|
...the
estimated passenger car and light
truck capacity of Beijing's existing
road network, taking into account the current
one-workday-per-week ban on private
cars from the city's urban core. |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
...the
estimated average number of new cars
and light trucks currently sold in Beijing
every day. |
|
|
30.0%-plus |
|
|
...the
estimated compound annual growth
rate in
new car and light truck sales in
China for the past decade. Economic
stimulus measures boosted
the year-over-year growth rate to 40.0%-plus in 2009. |
|
|
7.0 million |
|
|
...the
projected Beijing population of
passenger cars and light trucks in
2015. |
|
|
24.2 km/h |
|
|
...the
average driving
speed on Beijing roads during
morning rush hour during H1:10. |
|
|
-3.6% |
|
|
...the
year-over-year decline in the
average morning rush hour driving
speed in Beijing during
H1:10 versus H1:09. |
|
|
15.0 km/h |
|
|
...the
predicted average motor-vehicle
driving speed in Beijing in 2015, in
the absence of aggressive public
transportation infrastructure
improvements. |
|
|
40.0% |
|
|
...Beijing’s official 2010 target
for the proportion of local
residents using public transport for
their daily commute. This is up 200
bp from the 38.0% rate achieved in 2009. |
|
|
70.0% |
|
|
...the
estimated representative rate at
which local residents in the world’s
largest cities, not including Beijing,
currently use public transport for
their daily commute. |
|
|
Source: Government agency data;
industry data; Laguna Research
Partners calculations and estimates. |
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
New Privately-Owned Housing Units
Started
Monthly, Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through June 2010
Percent, Not Seasonally
Adjusted, Not Annualized |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Census Bureau, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year change in the
monthly number of new,
privately-owned housing units on
which construction was started during January 2008 through
June 2010. The chart below shows the
monthly number of total starts for
the same period. This data is not seasonally
adjusted and not annualized.
United States of America
New Privately-Owned Housing Units
Started
Monthly
January 2008 through June 2010
Thousands of Units, Not Seasonally
Adjusted, Not Annualized |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Census Bureau, USA.
US June housing starts - SAAR, or
seasonally adjusted annual rate, not
shown above - dropped 5.0% MoM
and 5.8% YoY to 549,000 units. On a
raw, non-adjusted and non-annualized
basis, shown above, US June starts
fell 4.9% MoM and 8.3% YoY to 54,200
units. For both data sets, the
decline in starts was particularly
pronounced in the multi-unit
structure market. LRP focuses
primarily on the non-adjusted,
non-annualized data set as being
most reflective of real-time,
on-the-ground realities regarding
both builder and lender confidence.
In the view of
LRP, US June housing start data sets reflect a US
economic recovery that is currently
stagnant.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Nonfarm
Job Openings
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year net change in
the number of US nonfarm job
openings*, monthly, during January 2008 through
May 2010. The chart below shows the
raw data from which the YoY change data above was
derived. Data in both charts is raw
and not seasonally adjusted.
United States of America
Nonfarm
Job Openings
Monthly
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The YoY net
change in the number of US nonfarm
job openings, as shown in the chart
above, was +755,000 in May
2010. This was is a 19.3% MoM
decline from the revised +935,000 of
April. As noted in a recent LRP Data
Focus, this cycle's trough was
-1.718 million, recorded in July
2009.
The total number
of US nonfarm job openings, as shown
in the chart directly above, was
3.207 million in May. This was an
11.9% MoM decline from the revised
3.638 M of April. This cycle's
trough of 2.212 million was realized
in November 2009. Not shown above,
the most recent cyclical peak was
5.132 million achieved in April
2006.
In the view of
LRP, this data set reflects a US
economic recovery that is currently
stagnant.
* Establishments
submit job openings information for
the last business day of the
reference month. A job opening
requires that: 1) a specific
position exists and there is work
available for that position, 2) work
could start within 30 days
regardless of whether a suitable
candidate is found, and 3) the
employer is actively recruiting from
outside the establishment to fill
the position. Included are
full-time, part-time, permanent,
short-term, and seasonal openings.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Motor Vehicle Retail Sales -
Domestic and Foreign Autos
Monthly
January 2008 through June 2010
Thousands of Units, Not
Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the total number of monthly US
retail sales of domestic and foreign
autos, in thousands of units, during
the January 2008 through
June 2010 period. The chart below shows the
monthly year-on-year change, for the
same data set. This data set is
not seasonally adjusted.
United States of America
Motor Vehicle Retail Sales -
Domestic and Foreign Autos
Monthly, Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through June 2010
Thousands of Units, Not
Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
In June 2010, the
total number of domestic and foreign
autos sold in the US was 500,000
units, up 43,800 units YoY and down
62,700 units MoM. The current
cycle's bottom in the monthly YoY
change came in May 2009 when the YoY
decline was 314,900 units. Since
then, the YoY increase has peaked at
95,500 units in March 2010 and has
struggled in the ensuing months, particularly
in June.
In the view of
LRP, this data set implies a US
economic recovery that is currently
stagnant.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -
Private Sector
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through June 2010
Thousands of Employees, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year net change in
raw, non-adjusted US
nonfarm payroll employment in the
private sector, monthly, during January 2008 through
June 2010. The chart below shows the
raw, non-adjusted data for US
nonfarm payroll employment in the
private sector, monthly, from which
the YoY change data above was
derived.
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -
Private Sector
Monthly
January 2008 through June 2010
Thousands of Employees, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
As shown in the
chart at the top, the net change in
raw US nonfarm payroll private
sector employment was -275,000 YoY
in June 2010, an improvement from
-821,000 YoY in May and -1.2
million YoY in April. This data
series bottomed out at -6.8 million YoY in June 2009, and LRP
anticipates that it will soon turn
positive for the first time since
March 2008.
In the view of
LRP, this data set continues to
imply a sluggish US economic
recovery.
(The primary
focus of US BLS Employment Situation
reports is the net change in nonfarm
payroll employment on a
month-on-month basis. These
month-on-month comparisons are
presented as both raw and
seasonally-adjusted, the latter
compensating for variations in
seasonal employment patterns. In the
chart at the top, LRP's calculation
of the year-on-year change
in raw data eliminates the need for
a seasonal adjustment and provides a
clearer view of on-the-ground
employment realities versus
seasonally-adjusted month-on-month
comparisons.)
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Unemployment Rate,
US BLS "U-6"
Monthly
June 2009 through June 2010
%,
Seasonally Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau
of Labor Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows monthly US BLS U-6*
unemployment data, seasonally
adjusted, for the June 2009
through June 2010 timeframe. The
chart below shows U-6 data for the
same period, but not
seasonally adjusted.
United States of America
Unemployment Rate,
US BLS "U-6"
Monthly
June 2009 through June 2010
%,
Not Seasonally Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau
of Labor Statistics, USA.
The
seasonally-adjusted US BLS U-6 unemployment rate for
June
2010 was 16.5%, down 10 basis points MoM versus 16.6% in
May 2010
and flat YoY with the 16.5% reported
for June 2009. The non-adjusted U-6
unemployment rate for June 2010
was 16.7%, up 60 basis points MoM
versus 16.1% in May 2010 and down 10 basis points YoY
versus 16.8% in
June 2009.
Economic data that is not seasonally adjusted
is typically more
volatile over time, but usually
provides an enhanced view of
circumstances "on the ground" during
a specific period or at a specific
point in time. Accordingly, current
US BLS U-6 unemployment
data that is not seasonally adjusted provides a window into the
real-time qualitative environment
for US workers, whether employed or
not, and their ability to make fixed
monthly mortgage and auto loan
payments, as well as their
willingness to make new durables
purchases and discretionary
expenditures for travel, restaurants
and other forms of entertainment and
leisure. In this sense, in the
opinion of LRP, the on-the-ground
employment situation for US workers
deteriorated notably during June
2010. As such, the prospects for a
consumer-led US economic recovery, as
government stimulus programs are
wound down, have, in our view,
diminished.
* "U-6": Total
unemployed, plus all marginally
attached workers, plus total
employed part time for economic
reasons, as a percent of the
civilian labor force plus all
marginally attached workers. Marginally
attached workers are persons who
currently are neither working nor
looking for work but indicate that
they want and are available for a
job and have looked for work
sometime in the recent past.
Discouraged workers, a subset of the
marginally attached, have given a
job-market related reason for not
looking currently for a job.
Persons employed part time for
economic reasons are those who want
and are available for full-time work
but have had to settle for a
part-time schedule. |
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
Japan
Consumer Price Index
Monthly
January 2008 through May 2010
% Change, Year-on-Year |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Statistics Bureau, Ministry
of Internal Affairs and
Communications, Japan.
Japan has taken one more small step
back from the deflation abyss. The
country's May 2010 Consumer Price Index was
up 0.1% MoM and
down only 0.9% YoY. This YoY decline
marked further improvement from the
1.1%, 1.1% and 1.2% YoY declines
reported for February, March and
April, respectively. And the 0.9%
YoY decline was also notable in that
it was achieved despite a 13.0% YoY
decline in education costs resulting
from the elimination of public high
school tuition fees by the ruling
Democratic Party of Japan. (Unless
this tuition elimination is
modified, a sharp YoY decline in
education costs is "baked in"
through March 2011.)
Japan
Consumer Price Index
"Ten Major Group Index"
May 2010
Index Value;
% Change, Month-on-Month and
Year-on-Year |
|
|
Group: |
Index
Value
(2005=100) |
% Change,
MoM |
% Change,
YoY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
99.7 |
0.1 |
-0.9 |
|
General (ex.
rent) |
99.8 |
0.2 |
-1.0 |
|
General (ex.
fresh food) |
99.2 |
0.1 |
-1.2 |
|
General (ex.
food, energy) |
97.3 |
0.0 |
-1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods |
100.4 |
0.2 |
-0.7 |
|
Services |
99.0 |
0.0 |
-1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food |
103.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.9 |
|
Housing |
99.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.4 |
|
Fuel, light,
water |
105.8 |
0.9 |
-0.5 |
|
Furniture,
household
utensils |
90.2 |
-0.3 |
-4.7 |
|
Clothes,
footwear |
101.8 |
0.6 |
-1.8 |
|
Medical care |
99.0 |
0.1 |
-0.3 |
|
Transportation,
communication |
99.3 |
0.7 |
2.4 |
|
Education |
89.8 |
0.1 |
-13.0 |
|
Reading,
recreation |
92.9 |
0.1 |
-1.7 |
|
Miscellaneous |
101.3 |
-0.1 |
-0.4 |
|
|
Source: Statistics Bureau,
Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications, Japan. |
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
European Union and Euro Area,
Selected Economies
Industrial Production
Monthly, Change versus Previous
Year
April 2010
Percent, Working Day
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Eurostat.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year percent change in
the level of industrial production,
working day adjusted, for selected
European Union and Euro Area
economies, and for the EU and EA on
average. Norway, also included
above, is a member of
neither the Union nor the Area, but
is fully integrated into the
European economy with more than
70.0% of its exports shipped to
other European countries. For the
same economies, the chart below
shows the YoY percent change in
consumer prices.
European Union
and Euro Area, Selected Economies
Consumer Price
Inflation
Monthly, Change versus Previous
Year
May 2010
Percent |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Eurostat.
Germany and The
Netherlands are currently
experiencing an impressive rate of
YoY growth in industrial production.
Both economies are also achieving a
low rate of consumer price
inflation.
Notably, three
European economies, the UK, Norway,
and Greece are at risk for
stagflation. The public spending and
sovereign debt problems of the UK
and Greece are well documented.
While sovereign debt is not
currently an issue for Norway, that
country's private debt levels are
notably high. Ireland currently
faces the dual challenge of weak
industrial production and declining
prices. Industrial production for
Hungary is robust, but inflation
remains a serious threat.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Nonfarm
Job Openings
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through April 2010
Thousands, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year net change in
the number of US nonfarm job
openings*, monthly, during January 2008 through
April 2010. The chart below shows the
raw data from which the YoY change data above was
derived. Data in both charts is raw
and not seasonally adjusted.
United States of America
Nonfarm
Job Openings
Monthly
January 2008 through April 2010
Thousands, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The YoY
net change in the number of
US nonfarm job openings was +731,000
in April 2010, as shown in the
chart at the top. This
represented a decisive improvement
from +116,000 in March and
-150,000 in February. This cycle's
trough was -1.718 million, recorded
in July
2009. Given that this data set
serves as a leading indicator among
employment data sets, its cyclical
trough has occurred sooner
than the cyclical inflection points occurring in other
employment-related data sets
monitored by LRP.
As shown in the
chart directly above, the total number
of US nonfarm job openings was 3.434
million in April, representing
continued improvement since this
cycle's November 2009 trough of
2.212 million. Not shown above, the
most recent cyclical peak was 5.132
million achieved in April 2006.
* Establishments
submit job openings information for
the last business day of the
reference month. A job opening
requires that: 1) a specific
position exists and there is work
available for that position, 2) work
could start within 30 days
regardless of whether a suitable
candidate is found, and 3) the
employer is actively recruiting from
outside the establishment to fill
the position. Included are
full-time, part-time, permanent,
short-term, and seasonal openings.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
"Discouraged Workers"
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year net change in
the number of US discouraged
workers*, monthly, during January 2008 through
May 2010. The chart below shows the
raw data from which the YoY change data above was
derived. This data set is released
in raw, non-adjusted, form only.
United States of America
"Discouraged Workers"
Monthly
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
As shown in the
chart at the top, the YoY
net change in the number of
US discouraged workers was +291,000
in May 2010. This was down
from the net increases reported in
each of the previous four months. To
date, this cycle's peak in the net
YoY change in the number of US
discouraged workers was +473,000 in
February 2010.
The total number
of US discouraged workers, as shown
in the chart directly above, was 1.083
million in May, notably lower than
both the April figure of 1.197
million and
the cycle's peak, to date, of 1.204
million in February 2010.
In general, LRP views
the May 2010 US BLS Employment
Situation report as modestly
positive, and indicative of a
sluggish economic recovery. US
employment data appears to have
"turned the corner" during the past
two to three months, but the rate of
improvement in on-the-ground
employment realities remains slow.
* US BLS defines
discouraged workers as "those who
did not actively look for work in
the prior 4 weeks for reasons such
as 1) thinks no work available, 2)
could not find work, 3) lacks
schooling or training, 4) employer
thinks too young or old, and 5)
other types of discrimination."
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Unemployed for 27 Weeks and
Over
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year net change in
the number of US unemployed who have
been unemployed for 27 weeks or
more, monthly, during January 2008 through
May 2010. The chart below shows the
raw data from which the YoY change data above was
derived. Data in both charts is raw
and not seasonally adjusted.
United States of America
Unemployed for 27 Weeks and
Over
Monthly
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The YoY
net change in the number of
US unemployed who have been unemployed
for 27 weeks or more, as seen in the
chart at the top, was +2.672 million
in May 2010. This represented
an improvement from
+3.119 million in April and +3.377
million in March. This data
series topped out at +3.681 million YoY in
January 2009. Not shown in the chart
at the top, the most recent month in which
the US economy has achieved a YoY
decline in the number of
unemployed who have been unemployed
for 27 weeks or more was August
2007.
As seen directly above, this cycle's
peak, to date, in the number of US
unemployed who have been unemployed
for 27 weeks or more was 7.020
million in April 2010.
In general, LRP views
the May 2010 US BLS Employment
Situation report as modestly
positive, and indicative of a
sluggish economic recovery.
(The primary
focus of US BLS Employment Situation
reports is the net change in data on a
month-on-month basis. These
month-on-month comparisons are
presented as both raw and
seasonally-adjusted, the latter
compensating for variations in
seasonal employment patterns. In the
chart at the top, LRP's calculation
of the year-on-year change
in raw data eliminates the need for
a seasonal adjustment and provides a
clearer view of on-the-ground
employment realities versus
seasonally-adjusted month-on-month
comparisons.)
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -
Private Sector
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Year
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands of Employees, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the year-on-year net change in
raw, non-adjusted US
nonfarm payroll employment in the
private sector, monthly, during January 2008 through
May 2010. The chart below shows the
raw, non-adjusted data for US
nonfarm payroll employment in the
private sector, monthly, from which
the YoY change data above was
derived.
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -
Private Sector
Monthly
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands of Employees, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The net change in
raw US nonfarm payroll employment in
the private sector, as shown in the
chart at the top, was -831,000 YoY
in May 2010, an improvement from
-1.1 million YoY in April and -2.2
million YoY in March. This data
series bottomed out at -6.8 million
YoY in June 2009, and LRP
anticipates that it will soon turn
positive for the first time since
March 2008.
In general, LRP views
the May 2010 US BLS Employment
Situation report as modestly
positive, and indicative of a
sluggish economic recovery.
(The primary
focus of US BLS Employment Situation
reports is the net change in nonfarm
payroll employment on a
month-on-month basis. These
month-on-month comparisons are
presented as both raw and
seasonally-adjusted, the latter
compensating for variations in
seasonal employment patterns. In the
chart at the top, LRP's calculation
of the year-on-year change
in raw data eliminates the need for
a seasonal adjustment and provides a
clearer view of on-the-ground
employment realities versus
seasonally-adjusted month-on-month
comparisons.)
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -
Private Sector
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Month
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands of Employees, Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the seasonally adjusted
month-on-month net change in US
nonfarm payroll employment in the
private sector during January 2008 through
May 2010. The chart below shows the
same data set, but not seasonally
adjusted.
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -
Private Sector
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Month
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands of Employees, Not Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The focus of the
US BLS Employment Situation report
for May 2010 was the number of new
jobs created, net, by the US
economy's private sector. As
shown in the chart at the top, the
private sector created a seasonally
adjusted 41,000 new jobs, net,
during the month of May. This
compared with a seasonally adjusted
158,000 and 218,000 new jobs
created, net, by the private sector
during March and April,
respectively. As indicated by the
raw, non-adjusted data in the chart
directly above, the private sector
created 711,000 new jobs, net,
during the month of May. This
compared with 727,000 and 1.1
million new jobs created, net,
during March and April,
respectively.
In sum, LRP views
the May 2010 US BLS Employment
Situation report as modestly
positive, and indicative of a
sluggish economic recovery.
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Nonfarm Payroll Employment -Total
Monthly, Net Change versus Previous
Month
January 2008 through May 2010
Thousands of Employees, Seasonally
Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The chart above
shows the seasonally adjusted
month-on-month net change in US
nonfarm payroll employment for January 2008 through
May 2010. Below
is monthly US BLS U-6*
unemployment rate data, not
seasonally adjusted, for May
2009 through May 2010.
As shown above,
the US economy added
431,000 net nonfarm payroll employees
during May, 411,000 of which were
temporary US government census
workers. The private sector added
41,000 net employees during May
indicating that the net MoM change
in US non-farm payrolls, normalized,
remained positive in May.
United States of America
Unemployment Rate,
US BLS "U-6"
Monthly
May 2009 through May 2010
%, Not Seasonally Adjusted |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Bureau of Labor
Statistics, USA.
The
broad U-6
US unemployment rate, not
seasonally adjusted, as shown above, declined 50 basis points MoM in May to 16.1%. LRP
views the non-adjusted
U-6 data as being more
representative of on-the-ground
realities for US workers and their
ability to make fixed monthly
mortgage and auto loan payments, as
well as their willingness to make
new durables purchases and
discretionary expenditures for
travel, restaurants and other forms
of entertainment and leisure.
In sum, LRP views
the May 2010 US BLS Employment
Situation report as modestly
positive, and indicative of a
sluggish economic recovery.
* "U-6": Total
unemployed, plus all marginally
attached workers, plus total
employed part time for economic
reasons, as a percent of the
civilian labor force plus all
marginally attached workers.
Marginally
attached workers are persons who
currently are neither working nor
looking for work but indicate that
they want and are available for a
job and have looked for work
sometime in the recent past.
Discouraged workers, a subset of the
marginally attached, have given a
job-market related reason for not
looking currently for a job.
Persons employed part time for
economic reasons are those who want
and are available for full-time work
but have had to settle for a
part-time schedule. |
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
Japan
Consumer Price Index
Monthly
January 2008 through April 2010
% Change, Year-on-Year |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Statistics Bureau, Ministry
of Internal Affairs and
Communications, Japan.
Japan's Consumer Price Index for
April 2010 was unchanged MoM and
down 1.2% YoY. On the surface, this
figure represents a slight
deterioration versus the 1.1% YoY
declines reported for both February
and March. As shown below, though,
the 1.2% decline in April reflected a
13.0% YoY decline in education costs
resulting from the elimination
of public high school tuition fees
by the ruling Democratic Party
of Japan. LRP estimates that,
excluding the impact of that
elimination, the YoY decline in the
April CPI would have been only 1.0%, a
slight improvement versus February
and March.
Japan
Consumer Price Index
"Ten Major Group Index"
April 2010
Index Value;
% Change, Month-on-Month and
Year-on-Year |
|
|
Group: |
Index
Value
(2005=100) |
% Change,
MoM |
% Change,
YoY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
99.6 |
0.0 |
-1.2 |
|
General (ex.
rent) |
99.6 |
0.0 |
-1.4 |
|
General (ex.
fresh food) |
99.2 |
-0.3 |
-1.5 |
|
General (ex.
food, energy) |
97.3 |
-0.4 |
-1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods |
100.2 |
1.0 |
-1.1 |
|
Services |
99.0 |
-0.9 |
-1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food |
103.5 |
0.9 |
-0.7 |
|
Housing |
99.5 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
|
Fuel, light,
water |
104.9 |
-0.3 |
-4.1 |
|
Furniture,
household
utensils |
90.5 |
0.3 |
-4.8 |
|
Clothes,
footwear |
101.2 |
3.7 |
-1.7 |
|
Medical care |
99.1 |
0.5 |
-0.1 |
|
Transportation,
communication |
98.6 |
0.2 |
1.9 |
|
Education |
89.7 |
-13.2 |
-13.0 |
|
Reading,
recreation |
92.8 |
0.3 |
-1.8 |
|
Miscellaneous |
101.4 |
0.0 |
-0.4 |
|
|
Source: Statistics Bureau,
Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications, Japan. |
|
|
LRP
Data Focus |
|
United States of America
Crude Oil, Value of Imports
Monthly
March 2009 through March 2010
As % of Total Trade Deficit |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Census Bureau, USA.
US crude oil
imports continue to play an
important role in the persistence of
the US trade deficit. In March
2010, as shown above, the value of US crude oil
imports accounted for 55.1% of the
total US trade deficit. This was up
sharply from 45.0% MoM and 41.6% YoY.
United States of America
Crude Oil, Average Cost of Imports
Monthly
March 2009 through March 2010
US Dollars per Barrel (1
barrel = 42 US gallons) |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Census Bureau, USA.
As shown in the
chart above, the average cost per
barrel of US crude oil imports was
US$74.32 in March 2010, up 1.9% MoM
from US$72.92
and up 79.7% YoY versus US$41.36. During the
March 2009 through January
2010 timeframe, as shown below, monthly US crude oil
imports
generally trended downward. During
February and March, though, import
volume was up 9.8% MoM and 11.2% MoM,
respectively.
United States of America
Crude Oil, Imports
Monthly
March 2009 through March 2010
Barrels per Day, Millions (1
barrel = 42 US gallons) |
|
 |
|
|
Source: Census Bureau, USA. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Disclosure
www.LagunaResearchPartners.com
© 1998-2012 Laguna Research Partners.
All rights reserved. |
|
|
|